Yeah, because no one has a satellites on Wyoming and wouldn't notice that at some point..
yep because EVERYONE watches wyoming so closely. it's not like we have better things to do then watch some useless hick-ass state that nobody cares about. i mean it would be different if we had multiple wars going on or an economic crisis to worry about, but sense everything else is just peachy, we really need to worry about what backwater places like wyoming, nebraska, and oklahoma are planning. we watch them thar hills like a hawk
Originally Posted by thedeparted
And lets pretend they get a big army of illegals. lol untrained army/poorly trained after basics vs. way more jets/tanks/highly trained soldiers. The war would end so fast lol
only if they do it wrong in stand-up battles you retard. the best way with an infirior force *KINDA LIKE THE TALIBAN* is to do it in hit-and-run attacks, (kinda like the taliban). yep because we destroyed the hell out of that taliban so fast lol
terrain would be a factor as well, but yeah. Wouldn't be much of problem. As for Taliban they were pretty much defeated from the get go. Having a few stragglers around and new recruits setting up IED and hit and run attacks doesn't exactly = legit force. The same thing would not happen with Wyoming as for they wouldn't have a radical religion reason to join the fight. Also, we could isolate them so hard. They wouldn't be able to survive with their resoures and we could just grind them out till they gave up.
ok i'm going to pick appart your argument here real quick to show you that you're retarded and need to go to logic school.
terrain would be a factor as well, but yeah. Wouldn't be much of problem." <-- what terrain? them being in a different state attacking things that matter? what terrain exactly are you talking about? when they DO attack, it would be in isolated incidents that would be hard to predict or react to. you dont seem to understand gurella warfare.
As for Taliban they were pretty much defeated from the get go." so we just left thousands of service members there for about a decade to.... what? party? they are still giving us a big problem and that's why we're still there you dolt. if they were "defeated from the get go" we would have been gone in a month.
The same thing would not happen with Wyoming as for they wouldn't have a radical religion reason to join the fight." mormons.
Also, we could isolate them so hard." yep because they're SO not used to that. it's not like they moved to wyoming for that specific purpose.
They wouldn't be able to survive with their resources" do you realise how many people in wyoming live off the land? sure there are cities and all that but most of the residents live on isolated ranches that pretty much provide for themselves.
as for the giving up part, what happens when they say "oh that wasn't us, it was an isolated group of extremeists, so we didn't do anything wrong, why are you attacking us?" oh, that's right. because again, that's how gurella warfare works. as you plainly don't grasp this concept, here's wiki to help your feeble mind.
Guerrilla warfare is a form of irregular warfare and refers to conflicts in which a small group of combatants including, but not limited to, armed civilians (or "irregulars") use military tactics, such as ambushes, sabotage, raids, the element of surprise, and extraordinary mobility to harass a larger and less-mobile traditional army, or strike a vulnerable target, and withdraw almost immediately.
2nd retort: It was clear we had other agendas than just beating the taliban man. Wyoming may be isolate but they can survive on their own resources for that long. They survive off other states resources.
oh? explain how they get those out of state resources to the isolated ranches that dont even have lines of communication. magic? you're being rediculous, sir. why would you even suggest that?
I dunno why you are suggesting Wyoming would have a chance in hell against america led force. So answer a question with a question. What is making you take this stance?
lol supertramp is just trolling you like a pro, not even he can take himself seriously.
I dont think aquiring an aircraft carried would be a bad idea becasue in a crisis you dont have to pay for anything. End of the world situation you just need a lot of fuel. Where better to hide your fuel than on a moving platform.
How am I doing? Ambivalent. Look, thats the word I'm using, either I am ambivalent or I'm not. -see what I did there?
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Jayhmmz in forum Consoles & PC
Last Post: 02-19-2011, 12:30 AM
By Charlotte in forum Post Anything
Last Post: 05-24-2010, 02:08 AM
By rukisuto in forum Movies & Tv
Last Post: 08-07-2008, 10:08 AM
» Site Navigation
» Recent Threads