Fable 3 vs. Fable 2

[a1i3n0ct0pu5]

so i just started playing Fable 3, and noticed first off the exxagerated motion blur. also its alot easier than Fable 2. iv noticed more custom weapons. graphics seem the same (besides the mad blur). what does everyone else think. was the first the best or what.

[Gh0sT-NoVa]

Wao so sad no replies , lol the forum is this inactive ? ?

I only play Fable 3 , uh never play Fable 2 , i didnt know of Fable until 3 released. Quite like Fable 3 , i recall you can turn off the motion blur no ?

I seen Fable 2 on vids etc , how can Fable 2 be same graphics , are u playing on console ?

[Jessy]

I have only played 2 and 3, I never played the first one. However I do think the second was going somewhere better.I like the idea of 3, but I dont think they implemented it very well. Focused too much on the whole "You are king now!" then the good decision making bits that made fable 2 good. I mean dont get me wrong, fable 3 had some decisions but they just didnt have the same feel. I will admit though, I did like those gnomes. They were a good second to the gargoyles, but nothing can replace those little A's lol.

Fable 3 was an okay game, and I liked a lot of the ideas and themes, but they messed up in its creation, and I know once im up there, I wont be making mistakes like that when I create games. ^^

[JayPearson4]

prefer fable 2, dont get bored of it as easy, you're right, fable 3 IS too easy!

[BobTD]

Im more a fan of the first, armor sets and finding weapons. A decent magic system. Maybe its just nostalgia.

[TheGateKeeper]

Haven't actually played the game but this review put me off:

[ROFLBRYCE]

Haven't actually played the game but this review put me off:

It's still worth the play man. It doesn't hold up to the other 2, but it's still a good 9 hour adventure.