BobTD
07-30-2010, 05:25 PM
So we have a "serious news forum" but we don't have an open debate are for non current events.
The way I see it working best would be to test it as a sub board to the serous news. Then we restrict who can open threads, and instead have a thread where people post ideas for debates. A mod then takes the best ideas and opens them up for members to debate using a set of rules.
The rules would basically be to discourage people from taking the debate to personally. I would recommend members starting by declaring what side of the topic they support, then they should post their opinion about the topic and reference internet sources to support their view.
Everyone should be encouraged to express an opinion. but, The rules would clearly have to state that you cant attack another members opinion directly, only their sources and only if you provide sources that clearly contradict those posted.
The credibility of the arguments sources should be the focus of the debate and not the perceived intelligence of other members.
This would of course require a one or more mods to keep things on track and within the boundaries of the debate.
If anyone can think of another way to organize a constructive debate board please feel free to post those as well. I would just be excited to see a chance for members to take part in something that stimulates deep thought and consideration beyond "you are wrong, dili is buthurt blah blah blah"
The way I see it working best would be to test it as a sub board to the serous news. Then we restrict who can open threads, and instead have a thread where people post ideas for debates. A mod then takes the best ideas and opens them up for members to debate using a set of rules.
The rules would basically be to discourage people from taking the debate to personally. I would recommend members starting by declaring what side of the topic they support, then they should post their opinion about the topic and reference internet sources to support their view.
Everyone should be encouraged to express an opinion. but, The rules would clearly have to state that you cant attack another members opinion directly, only their sources and only if you provide sources that clearly contradict those posted.
The credibility of the arguments sources should be the focus of the debate and not the perceived intelligence of other members.
This would of course require a one or more mods to keep things on track and within the boundaries of the debate.
If anyone can think of another way to organize a constructive debate board please feel free to post those as well. I would just be excited to see a chance for members to take part in something that stimulates deep thought and consideration beyond "you are wrong, dili is buthurt blah blah blah"