If Multiplayer on Live was free, BUT

[Scott]

If it was free to play multi-player games on Live, BUT you had to pay(gold Subscription) to have access to anything else Live offers a la demos, movies, TV shows, map-packs, expansions, trailers, etc...

Would you still pay for Live?

[Trunks]

That doesn't really make sense? So I have to pay for live then buy the mappacks? No company would do that.

[Hockeyfan]

No way. I could care less about everything else.

[blaze4556]

No way. I could care less about everything else.

Agreed :yes:

[Ghost]

No I would stop paying instantly

[rukisuto]

I wouldn't.
I use live for the multi-player experience.
Not much else, really.

[Crazyspawn]

I wouldn't. It wouldn't make since from a business perspective either.

[Joshuah]

I only play live for multiplayer with other people, nothing eles :-)

[Hawk]

I'd still pay
for MSN and such.

[LiNuX]

people buy gaming consoles to play games - not to get movies and stuff, and you can get demos for free from many places - internet, gaming magazines, etc...