Scott
09-26-2008, 06:50 PM
Man Sues Doctors For Amputating *****
What part of "circumcision" was unclear? That's basically what a Kentucky man and his wife are asking of two doctors who cut off the man's ***** while he was under the knife. The doctors say they discovered cancer and made an emergency decision. The man says, dude, wtf, you cut off my *****. It doesn't grow back, and it was kind of important to me.
The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a circumcision and only a circumcision, and that Seaton did not consent to his ***** being removed.
Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said [Dr.] Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin.
"Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,' and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said.
We've just made a new note to self: if we ever have surgery, we intend to grab the doctor by the collar and say vigorously to him, "No matter what happens, don't you cut off my *****." Who knew you had to worry about that sort of thing.
Watch the video report on the story at
Man Sues Doctors After Penis Amputated - Health News Story - WLKY Louisville (http://www.wlky.com/health/17550187/detail.html)
Link (http://tinyurl.com/4e9j3o)
Oh my Science that's ****ing insane.
Seriously now, anytime I go under for anything I will tell them not to touch my *****.
With that being said, why would he be getting a circumcision at that age in the first place?
What part of "circumcision" was unclear? That's basically what a Kentucky man and his wife are asking of two doctors who cut off the man's ***** while he was under the knife. The doctors say they discovered cancer and made an emergency decision. The man says, dude, wtf, you cut off my *****. It doesn't grow back, and it was kind of important to me.
The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a circumcision and only a circumcision, and that Seaton did not consent to his ***** being removed.
Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said [Dr.] Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin.
"Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,' and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said.
We've just made a new note to self: if we ever have surgery, we intend to grab the doctor by the collar and say vigorously to him, "No matter what happens, don't you cut off my *****." Who knew you had to worry about that sort of thing.
Watch the video report on the story at
Man Sues Doctors After Penis Amputated - Health News Story - WLKY Louisville (http://www.wlky.com/health/17550187/detail.html)
Link (http://tinyurl.com/4e9j3o)
Oh my Science that's ****ing insane.
Seriously now, anytime I go under for anything I will tell them not to touch my *****.
With that being said, why would he be getting a circumcision at that age in the first place?