-
I've played both now, I've also played the first 2 Halos. And I have to say that Halo 3's single-player is a disappointment. It's too easy and as someones said somewhere all the Brutes do is side-step the AI is rubbish! and I am still looking for the enemies who apparently start at different places every time you restart. The graphics are good but not the best on the 360 and the story was good it had a better ending than 2.
But Bioshock on the other hand has good graphics difficult opponents (It doesnt have the best AI ever either though), you can carry more than 2 weapons and a good story but it is short and there is no single-player so its not going to last you very long.
So, in the end I think Bioshock is better it has better graphics and is more difficult.
-
Halo 3 is better it will last you longer. Well you will never want rid of it because of the multi-player
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasperking
My m8 said that halo 3 is really boring unless you go on legendary.. and he sucks at games so that really shows on halo 3 :p
Halo is easy because the AI is so bad
-
Are we voting on Xbox i dont realy know. I played Bioshock and i played Halo 3 so i realy dont know... Bioshock i think he will be presedent the game of the year with crysis 2... So i vote fo Bioshock cus Halo 3 hase all 10/10 but it isnt pronounced a game of the year and bioshock hase so ...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiba
Are we voting on Xbox i dont realy know. I played Bioshock and i played Halo 3 so i realy dont know... Bioshock i think he will be presedent the game of the year with crysis 2... So i vote fo Bioshock cus Halo 3 hase all 10/10 but it isnt pronounced a game of the year and bioshock hase so ...
Yeah there both 360 games but it doesn't matter which version you've played
|
» Site Navigation
» Friends
» Sponsors
|