|
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecreationalGamer
Aside from the law, I'm speaking strictly in a humane perspective of the subject. If two people are alone in the world and one of them kills the other, the killer has then given up his value in life as well.
So the law is above moral Structure ? hmmmm
-
Other, you do realize he did say "Aside from the law, I'm speaking strictly in a humane prespective of the subject"
he removed the law from the equation
his saying that by killing life the killer has no general respect for himself or life in general.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jokersvirus
Other, you do realize he did say "Aside from the law, I'm speaking strictly in a humane prespective of the subject"
Talk about a face palm.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecreationalGamer
Talk about a face palm.
USELESS post ....
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by other_are_there
I know you got about 3300000 in my book , The law consist of people that person who injects those toxins into the person who committed the crime . They are killing a person . Wether thats there job or not They are killing a person.
I would love for you to list the three million, three hundred thousand face palms in your book that pertain to my posts.
You're still missing the point.
However, you are right about one thing: the law still exists.
-
Well honestly I am sorry for my Facepalm post . I was trying to keep it mature up in here . So I am going to go back and edit that post , As for the law . My more friendly response is , I still think that killing a person is wrong wether your the law or a psycho .
-
Ive been asking my friends about this around campus, law enforcement and other majors, they all agree that its needed, and they all agree saying its for justice and scumbags like that dont need to be on this earth.
The process is long and expensive, if youve been found guilty .357 is alot cheaper than the current process.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jokersvirus
if youve been found guilty .357 is alot cheaper than the current process.
That calls into question the validity of the process being used by authorities today. When you can get the same process at a local ammo shop for millions of dollars cheaper a year than you can at the current process...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecreationalGamer
That calls into question the validity of the process being used by authorities today. When you can get the same process at a local ammo shop for millions of dollars cheaper a year than you can at the current process...
Yeah why is is more humane to inject people with toxins then it is too shoot them in the head . I think that we just need to realize our Laws moral code is really wack .
-
I see what your saying Jango. Thank you for elaborating, I always enjoy reading your point of view because its often one I dont think from naturally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecreationalGamer
Aside from the law, I'm speaking strictly in a humane perspective of the subject. If two people are alone in the world and one of them kills the other, the killer has then given up his value in life as well.
A great perspective however, not one everyone would agree with. If you value your life you do whatever it takes to survive. This drive to eliminate threats does not mean you don't value life.
So even if its not direct self defense, the enforcement of the death penalty is in defense of society. Holding a murderers life sacred demeans the value of the victims life.
The idea that as a cardinal rule you cant kill someone without devaluing your life is a purely religious perspective where all life must be held sacred. Not everyone shares this point of view.
The flaw is simply that even if you hold life sacred others may not. Its more responsible to take your protection into your own hands then expect others to share the same belief in the sacred value of life.
|
» Site Navigation
» Friends
» Sponsors
|
