• 06-20-2011, 09:26 PM
    Jayhmmz
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ilyich Valken View Post
    It's not, though. I realize that not everything he says will make it into the final game, but from what I've read, they're developing the game to be like CoD 4, not MW2, that weapon/attachment unlocks will have a unique system, and that OMA/DC/Commando and the nuke are out, and that all of the sound/HUD are just placeholders and will be fixed at the appropriate time.

    If this is the case, and if it is more like CoD4, then I will get it at some point, as I loved CoD4.

    However, Call of Duty is getting demoted from my PC to my console, if and when I buy the next one, because the visuals are insulting to my PC, and just not worth the effort; casual game is casual.
  • 06-20-2011, 10:26 PM
    Ilyich Valken
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Jayhmmz View Post
    If this is the case, and if it is more like CoD4, then I will get it at some point, as I loved CoD4.

    However, Call of Duty is getting demoted from my PC to my console, if and when I buy the next one, because the visuals are insulting to my PC, and just not worth the effort; casual game is casual.

    Honestly, I never bothered with Call of Duty for the PC. Ever since 4 it was clear PC wasn't their main focus any more, which is a shame (and is part of the reason the graphics have stagnated, I'd imagine.)
  • 06-21-2011, 06:14 AM
    Jayhmmz
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ilyich Valken View Post
    Honestly, I never bothered with Call of Duty for the PC. Ever since 4 it was clear PC wasn't their main focus any more, which is a shame (and is part of the reason the graphics have stagnated, I'd imagine.)

    You're absolutely right. The main reason I got WaW and Blops for PC was for the dedicated servers, because matchmaking on a PC is just ****ing stupid. But I got MW2 for the PC for the graphics, because let's be fair, it craps on Blops for graphics, and the player models are much cooler.

    In terms of gameplay though, I enjoy it a lot more for the xbox these days, as it just seems more balanced!
  • 06-23-2011, 08:13 PM
    StanTheMan
    For me, the decision all about the game play and achievements. I don't care about graphics, how many levels there are, the number of maps, etc. I will always choose a game where just playing one match is impossible, where I get on at midday, and then I look at the clock and its almost midnight. To me, Battlefield 3 will be that game, just as its predecessor Bad Company 2 was.
  • 06-28-2011, 03:21 PM
    M1xicanBoyy
    bad com 3 because u can actually destoy buildings to kill campers hehehe and the graphics will look amazing!!!! will change gaming in my opinion:D
  • 06-28-2011, 04:42 PM
    NeverDeefEated
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Jayhmmz View Post
    BF3 will be better than MW3 , because Activision and their respected developers have ran out of ideas on how to make Call of Duty look and feel fresh [support this], compared to the same thing over and over again, like what they've got into the habit of doing these days[support this]. EA DICE and the Battlefield series have managed to bring us countless mega-fun titles[support this. what makes it 'mega-fun?'], and most of them are significantly better than the last (gameplay and graphically)[support this], whilst still making it feel like a Battlefield game.

    Quite simply put, Activision & Co. are lazy[support this], whereas EA DICE put a lot of effort and thought into each title that they bring us[support this]. The graphics are constantly improved upon in Battlefield, as well as the award winning sound effects[award winning? what awards?], and the mass tactical team-play in the Battlefield franchise is second to no game, in my opinion[I'm glad you said "in my opinion" here].

    Conclusion: Activision do it purely for the money[support this], whereas EA DICE do it for the fans of the franchise[support this], as well as making their profit.

    Mind refining that answer?
  • 06-28-2011, 09:34 PM
    egg-whites333
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Saph View Post
    Ugh what the hell is it called >.< I cant remember anymore!!!

    Either way, it was a WWII CoD :p


    its world at war and i haven't ever played battlefield but i heard its good i think that black ops was a disappointment but still like it mw2 was probably the best out of them all
  • 06-28-2011, 09:51 PM
    Exentenzed
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeverDeefEated View Post
    Mind refining that answer?

    Realy? No, realy???
  • 07-03-2011, 10:44 AM
    Jayhmmz
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeverDeefEated View Post
    Mind refining that answer?

    I do mind, so I won't refine my answer :)
  • 07-04-2011, 03:13 AM
    Jokersvirus
    I cant pick between the two. I like both series and ive played both. Battlefield gives you more options and more free area to roam around and kill. Flying the helicopters is pretty sweet. MW its the maps, killstreaks, funny ways of killing people that keep me around. So I Cant pick a winner and I say both.

» Site Navigation

» Home
» FAQ

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

» Recent Threads

Prestamos De Dinero En...
04-10-2025 01:43 AM
04-10-2025 01:43 AM

» Sponsors