|
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakncoke
unless youtube did it themselfs as embedding populars vids probably takes up a hefty amount resource.
well they still have equipment worth millions so i doubt the resource is that high. big web sites generally have double the resources they need...even i do
like this forum never uses more than 20-25 gb of bandwidth a month, i have more than double just in case lol
and also sites like youtube which was bought by a huge company for $1.2 billion - has unlimited bandwidth because they are on their own network...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiNuX
well they still have equipment worth millions so i doubt the resource is that high. big web sites generally have double the resources they need...even i do
like this forum never uses more than 20-25 gb of bandwidth a month, i have more than double just in case lol
and also sites like youtube which was bought by a huge company for $1.2 billion - has unlimited bandwidth because they are on their own network...
well it could lead to being higher than they want with the millions of vids being embedded across the internet.
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakncoke
well it could lead to being higher than they want with the millions of vids being embedded across the internet.
still youtube should have unlimited resources - and i dont think youtube disables embedding on popular videos cuz look at evolution of dance video - 94 million views and nothing.
also it could have been by request of the artist - cuz i looked at a few shakira music vids...all disabled
-
shakira parody on mad tv lol
YouTube - Shakira Parody
remember watching it when it first aired, hilarious
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiNuX
still youtube should have unlimited resources - and i dont think youtube disables embedding on popular videos cuz look at evolution of dance video - 94 million views and nothing.
also it could have been by request of the artist - cuz i looked at a few shakira music vids...all disabled
1st bold- probably close to unlimited but not, google has to draw the line somewhere.
2nd bold- that's probably the correct answer
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakncoke
1st bold- probably close to unlimited but not, google has to draw the line somewhere.
2nd bold- that's probably the correct answer
by resources I meant bandwidth..should have been specific - they can transfer data in and out as much as they want, they are on their own network
but in terms of physical servers, yeah...they have limited number of those, probably in the thousands but still not unlimited.
and watching videos from their site only affects bandwidth, the video takes up hard drive space but thats just a one time deal.
-
its really late and i find myself saying the same thing three times in one post lol
-
not even 2 am...cant believe i am tired
|
» Site Navigation
» Friends
» Sponsors
|
