ok i'm going to pick appart your argument here real quick to show you that you're retarded and need to go to logic school.
terrain would be a factor as well, but yeah. Wouldn't be much of problem." <-- what terrain? them being in a different state attacking things that matter? what terrain exactly are you talking about? when they DO attack, it would be in isolated incidents that would be hard to predict or react to. you dont seem to understand gurella warfare.
As for Taliban they were pretty much defeated from the get go." so we just left thousands of service members there for about a decade to.... what? party? they are still giving us a big problem and that's why we're still there you dolt. if they were "defeated from the get go" we would have been gone in a month.
The same thing would not happen with Wyoming as for they wouldn't have a radical religion reason to join the fight." mormons.
Also, we could isolate them so hard." yep because they're SO not used to that. it's not like they moved to wyoming for that specific purpose.
They wouldn't be able to survive with their resources" do you realise how many people in wyoming live off the land? sure there are cities and all that but most of the residents live on isolated ranches that pretty much provide for themselves.
as for the giving up part, what happens when they say "oh that wasn't us, it was an isolated group of extremeists, so we didn't do anything wrong, why are you attacking us?" oh, that's right. because again, that's how gurella warfare works. as you plainly don't grasp this concept, here's wiki to help your feeble mind.
Wikimedia Error
Guerrilla warfare is a form of irregular warfare and refers to conflicts in which a small group of combatants including, but not limited to, armed civilians (or "irregulars") use military tactics, such as ambushes, sabotage, raids, the element of surprise, and extraordinary mobility to harass a larger and less-mobile traditional army, or strike a vulnerable target, and withdraw almost immediately.