Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty

[Trunks]

BF2 had an almost non existing campaign? There was no campaign at all! Battlefield has mainly been a multiplayer franchise.

Bad company 1 and 2 was DICE, more or less testing themselves as story writers and scripters to create a campaign within the battlefield franchise.
It was a fun and entertaining story and that is what matters.
and at the same time it was also a completely new multiplayer mode within battlefield in those games.

Of course when it comes to Call of Duty my biggest concern is not the singleplayer, which mostly are great. it's the multiplayer and features that are moving forward at a way to slow pace.

And considering one is using 5-15 hours on a FPS's campaign vs the huge amount of time one uses on FPS's multiplayers nowadays. I find battlefield to be much more worth my money.

I usually just borrow the CoD games from a mate or something since i only want the story, and can't be bothered to spend my time on CoD's multiplayer.



Of course there where bugs in the BETA, are you unfamiliar with what a beta is? Besides, at the time of the beta they used a old version of the game to prevent people beeing bothered to rip it and creating hacked servers.
most of the bug's that showed up was allready fixed. and their main goal with the beta was also to stress test the servers.


You really need to get your facts updated.


If a CoD game that is going to be another copy/paste is really what you want then good for you.


It is a true sequel to BF2, of course they had to create it on PC, It's something that the BF fans appriciate. And it's looking pretty good on console aswell...


This. One of the only thing in your entire post of "facts" that i can agree with.


It's not that i want to, but from what i've read, i sort of have to.

Test or not, they were still BF games, how can you compare the two franchises if two of there games were just "test". So you're saying so far BF2 is the only game that is real? Well, looks like were winning by a long shot, because BF series has fail to release a title in 5 years.

Not sure what games you've been playing, but they had way new features every time to the multiplayer. There really isn't much more they can do to it. For FPS games, the best improvements that can be made in my opinion to make the game engine run smoother. That's what they did, they modified MW2 engine for the game, but changed the rest, it's not an exact mirror. Games do it all the time, over 50 games used the quake 3 engine before in the past. Just because it's a mirror doesn't mean it's a copy and paste LOL

and I did check my "facts", BF3 won't have the customizable load outs like MW3 has. Go look it up your self bud, you'll get it to an externes, but nothing like MW3.

I rather have a game created to run onto my system, not another one then "copy and pasted" to console.

you're just telling me how BF3 will be better online, you really didn't give out any points to it at all. You're worried about how CoD will be the same, if you take a look at BF 2 and BF 3, they are not changing much there lol. Looks like you need to get your facts straight.