|
-
 Originally Posted by Jayhmmz
This.
However, I'm not all that excited for the new trilogy, as the franchise could be easily killed off.
This is so very true, as Halo was intended to be a 3 part story anyways. I'm curious to see how it will play out.
 Originally Posted by Delta
Ppl say tht Halo Reach is apparently before halo 1 and Rooster Teeth did an easter egg tht at the end of the game if u move ur head to the right you see Master Chief in the drop pod soooooo thts y i think i should play reach first cuz idk
All this is is an easter egg. The events on Reach take place 20 years before Halo 1, but hardly relate to the Halo series itself, besides explaining
 Originally Posted by Delta
im not playin em backwards im playin em Halo Reach Halo 1 Halo 2 then Halo 3
This will still spoil the series for you. It's a much more enjoyable experience to play CE, 2, 3, ODST, then Reach. THEN after, if you're actually interested in the story, playing Halo Wars, Reach, CE, 2, Halo 3:ODST, Halo 3, and now 4 for the complete story, in order. I'll admit I can't go and spurt out events from each Halo, but I had a marathon of playing them in the first, then second order. I had more fun playing it in order of release, but I understood the story better playing it in the timeline of the story.
Your call man!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Replies: 24
Last Post: 01-13-2011, 05:15 AM
-
By flynny in forum Microsoft Xbox
Replies: 6
Last Post: 02-02-2009, 06:32 PM
-
Replies: 16
Last Post: 01-08-2008, 07:01 PM
-
By Raw! in forum Shooters
Replies: 17
Last Post: 11-15-2007, 05:04 AM
-
Replies: 10
Last Post: 09-20-2007, 04:51 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
» Site Navigation
» Friends
» Sponsors
|