Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CraeSC111

So what has DICE added to BF3 that wasn't in previous games?

---

The biggest things are of course the graphics, animations and improved destructions(way better than in previous games) as well as the best sounds ever.

More and better unlocks as well as weapon attachments, 64 player mp(I think it was 32 in earlier games), battlelog, new squad respawn system, bipods, lasers, flashlights, better revive system(now the fallen can choose if they want to be revived instead of being forced)

scope reflections to make it harder for campers
You can get blinded by earlier mentioned flashlights, lasers as well as going out from a dark place(I think)

This is the things I know, there are more things.

I believe you could get 64 player games on BF2. How does the new squad respawn work?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CraeSC111

I believe you could get 64 player games on BF2. How does the new squad respawn work?

---

Now looking at it its not so much of a change, from what I can tell you can only spawn on your squad leader instead of the whole squad(But I think someone more into the game should tell more)

And I think its only 32 players on bf2, I only saw mods allowing you to play 64 in mp, but I will look some more.

Battlefield 3. MW is just the same over and over again now.

I've always been a Call of Duty Person lol

I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [AF]VictorVII

I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience

---

uhm, what is better, Battlefield or call of duty. It doesnt say much calling it it.

---------- Post added at 05:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:04 PM ----------

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [AF]VictorVII

I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience

---

uhm, what is better, Battlefield or call of duty. It doesnt say much calling it it.

Well, I'm a Battlefield fanboy. But, What I do hate is when people try to compare Call of Duty to Battlefield, For one. Call of Duty Is (In my opinion) An arcade shooter Filled with quick intense gameplay. While battlefield on the other hand is a conquest shooter.

Second of all, In CoD the Killstreaks are ridiculous. I mean, what is the point in killing 25 people in a row just to blow you and everyone else up? Don't get me wrong, CoD Is a great game, for the people it was made for. When people think "Fast intense shooters" they think of CoD But something needs to change, they need to update their graphics, or improve gameplay or just do something that will put them ontop again, because frankly. It's getting old.

Battlefield makes you feel like you're in that war. It blinds you with Flashlights, red dots, and dust... lots and lots of dust. The sounds are the best I've ever heard from a shooter, The Environment is amazing, especially Caspian Border. It's simply amazing to be trying to capture the Forest CP then to look up to see that Tower thing come crashing down. or taking cover behind a building, then the next minute a stray tank shot blasts straight though you. And their are no Killstreaks, Battlefield makes you feel like you had an effect on how it will turn out. I've personally been in matches where my team has been triple capped, with only about 50 tokens left, to make a comeback and snatch victory, it's truly an amazing feeling.

Anyway I think I've rambled on for far too long.

Yes, sorry for being so vague. I, of course, meant BF3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BBloodstain

Well, I'm a Battlefield fanboy. But, What I do hate is when people try to compare Call of Duty to Battlefield, For one. Call of Duty Is (In my opinion) An arcade shooter Filled with quick intense gameplay. While battlefield on the other hand is a conquest shooter.

Second of all, In CoD the Killstreaks are ridiculous. I mean, what is the point in killing 25 people in a row just to blow you and everyone else up? Don't get me wrong, CoD Is a great game, for the people it was made for. When people think "Fast intense shooters" they think of CoD But something needs to change, they need to update their graphics, or improve gameplay or just do something that will put them ontop again, because frankly. It's getting old.

Battlefield makes you feel like you're in that war. It blinds you with Flashlights, red dots, and dust... lots and lots of dust. The sounds are the best I've ever heard from a shooter, The Environment is amazing, especially Caspian Border. It's simply amazing to be trying to capture the Forest CP then to look up to see that Tower thing come crashing down. or taking cover behind a building, then the next minute a stray tank shot blasts straight though you. And their are no Killstreaks, Battlefield makes you feel like you had an effect on how it will turn out. I've personally been in matches where my team has been triple capped, with only about 50 tokens left, to make a comeback and snatch victory, it's truly an amazing feeling.

Anyway I think I've rambled on for far too long.

---

Agreed. I like putting it this way, for people who are savvy with football (soccer) video games. CoD is Pro Evo Soccer, and BF3 is the FIFA of the two. The latter being the most realistic, of course.