View Poll Results: Which game is most likely going to be the better game?

Voters
68. You may not vote on this poll
  • Battlefield 3

    44 64.71%
  • Call of Duty

    24 35.29%
Page 24 of 27 FirstFirst ... 142223242526 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 263
  1. #231
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CraeSC111 View Post
    So what has DICE added to BF3 that wasn't in previous games?
    The biggest things are of course the graphics, animations and improved destructions(way better than in previous games) as well as the best sounds ever.

    More and better unlocks as well as weapon attachments, 64 player mp(I think it was 32 in earlier games), battlelog, new squad respawn system, bipods, lasers, flashlights, better revive system(now the fallen can choose if they want to be revived instead of being forced)

    scope reflections to make it harder for campers
    You can get blinded by earlier mentioned flashlights, lasers as well as going out from a dark place(I think)

    This is the things I know, there are more things.
    Last edited by paecmaker; 01-15-2012 at 02:35 PM.

  2. #232
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    In your thread
    Posts
    1,845

    Default

    I believe you could get 64 player games on BF2. How does the new squad respawn work?

  3. #233
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CraeSC111 View Post
    I believe you could get 64 player games on BF2. How does the new squad respawn work?
    Now looking at it its not so much of a change, from what I can tell you can only spawn on your squad leader instead of the whole squad(But I think someone more into the game should tell more)

    And I think its only 32 players on bf2, I only saw mods allowing you to play 64 in mp, but I will look some more.
    Last edited by paecmaker; 01-15-2012 at 02:49 PM.

  4. #234
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Battlefield 3. MW is just the same over and over again now.

  5. #235
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Age
    45
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I've always been a Call of Duty Person lol

  6. #236
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    34
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience

  7. #237
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [AF]VictorVII View Post
    I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience
    uhm, what is better, Battlefield or call of duty. It doesnt say much calling it it.

    ---------- Post added at 05:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:04 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by [AF]VictorVII View Post
    I think its better because the matches are bigger, there are more weapons, its just basically a better online experience
    uhm, what is better, Battlefield or call of duty. It doesnt say much calling it it.

  8. #238
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Well, I'm a Battlefield fanboy. But, What I do hate is when people try to compare Call of Duty to Battlefield, For one. Call of Duty Is (In my opinion) An arcade shooter Filled with quick intense gameplay. While battlefield on the other hand is a conquest shooter.

    Second of all, In CoD the Killstreaks are ridiculous. I mean, what is the point in killing 25 people in a row just to blow you and everyone else up? Don't get me wrong, CoD Is a great game, for the people it was made for. When people think "Fast intense shooters" they think of CoD But something needs to change, they need to update their graphics, or improve gameplay or just do something that will put them ontop again, because frankly. It's getting old.

    Battlefield makes you feel like you're in that war. It blinds you with Flashlights, red dots, and dust... lots and lots of dust. The sounds are the best I've ever heard from a shooter, The Environment is amazing, especially Caspian Border. It's simply amazing to be trying to capture the Forest CP then to look up to see that Tower thing come crashing down. or taking cover behind a building, then the next minute a stray tank shot blasts straight though you. And their are no Killstreaks, Battlefield makes you feel like you had an effect on how it will turn out. I've personally been in matches where my team has been triple capped, with only about 50 tokens left, to make a comeback and snatch victory, it's truly an amazing feeling.

    Anyway I think I've rambled on for far too long.

  9. #239
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    34
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Yes, sorry for being so vague. I, of course, meant BF3

  10. #240
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    UK
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,959

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BBloodstain View Post
    Well, I'm a Battlefield fanboy. But, What I do hate is when people try to compare Call of Duty to Battlefield, For one. Call of Duty Is (In my opinion) An arcade shooter Filled with quick intense gameplay. While battlefield on the other hand is a conquest shooter.

    Second of all, In CoD the Killstreaks are ridiculous. I mean, what is the point in killing 25 people in a row just to blow you and everyone else up? Don't get me wrong, CoD Is a great game, for the people it was made for. When people think "Fast intense shooters" they think of CoD But something needs to change, they need to update their graphics, or improve gameplay or just do something that will put them ontop again, because frankly. It's getting old.

    Battlefield makes you feel like you're in that war. It blinds you with Flashlights, red dots, and dust... lots and lots of dust. The sounds are the best I've ever heard from a shooter, The Environment is amazing, especially Caspian Border. It's simply amazing to be trying to capture the Forest CP then to look up to see that Tower thing come crashing down. or taking cover behind a building, then the next minute a stray tank shot blasts straight though you. And their are no Killstreaks, Battlefield makes you feel like you had an effect on how it will turn out. I've personally been in matches where my team has been triple capped, with only about 50 tokens left, to make a comeback and snatch victory, it's truly an amazing feeling.

    Anyway I think I've rambled on for far too long.
    Agreed. I like putting it this way, for people who are savvy with football (soccer) video games. CoD is Pro Evo Soccer, and BF3 is the FIFA of the two. The latter being the most realistic, of course.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. call of duty
    By leica in forum Post Anything
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 07:31 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 10:10 PM
  3. Call of Duty 4
    By Ghost in forum Call of Duty
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-01-2009, 08:48 AM
  4. What Do You Think Of Call Of Duty 4
    By RazzleDazzle in forum Call of Duty
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 03:57 PM
  5. Call of Duty 4 - WTF?
    By FallenMorgan in forum Call of Duty
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 09:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Site Navigation

» Home
» FAQ

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

» Recent Threads

Prestamos De Dinero En...
04-10-2025 01:43 AM
04-10-2025 01:43 AM

» Sponsors