Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty

[Jayhmmz]

Singleplayer: Call of Duty owns Battlefield in this area. BC2 even tried to copy MW and MW2. Call of Duty has always had great singleplayer's.

Of course Call of Duty owns Battlefield in this area, because EA DICE only started making their Battlefield series a campaign style game when they released Bad Company 2. Also, I heavily disagree with what you said about BC/BC2 trying to copy MW and MW2, as both Bad Company campaigns were completely different and unique compared to the Call of Duty campaigns... I have no idea how you came to that conclusion, it baffles me.

Graphics: I prefer Call of Duty. Its graphics are somewhat more realistic than Battlefield's.

Factually, Battlefield: Bad Company 2 has more realistic graphics than any other Call of Duty game, however, past Call of Duty games have always had an edge over the older Battlefield games. With the older Battlefield games being mass-multiplayer action, it meant that back in the day they couldn't really afford to make the visuals in the games any better than they already were. However, having said that, Battlefield 2's visuals for when it was released in 2005 were excellent, but just fell short of the likes of Call of Duty 2, as Infinity Ward's graphics engine owned a lot of game engines around that time.