Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty

[Shooter99]

This is how I see it:

Singleplayer: Call of Duty owes Battlefield in this area. BC2 even tried to copy MW and MW2. Call of Duty has always had great singleplayer's.

Graphics: I prefer Call of Duty. Its graphics are somewhat more realistic than Battlefield's.

Physics and effects: While Battlefield has destructible enviornment and everything in the game can be destroyed, Call of Duty has soda cans that are immune to explosions. I prefer Battlefield in this case.

Multiplayer: The older Call of Duty games had fantastic multiplayers (with 2 being my favourite). But the new Call of Duty releases just don't feel good. They're all run and gun games, with insane weapon combinations and perks. I don't like the way Call of Duty's multiplayer has evolved. Battlefield on the other hand, offers much more freedom, more options, and team-work is essential. Apart from BF2, there were no unbalanced Battlefield games. So I prefer Battlefield.

I can’t really decide which one is a better game. I buy Call of Duty games for their singleplayer and co-op modes (co-op campaign, spec-ops and zombies) and I buy Battlefield games for their unique mulyiplayer.