Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty

[Shooter99]

Of course Call of Duty owns Battlefield in this area, because EA DICE only started making their Battlefield series a campaign style game when they released Bad Company 2. Also, I heavily disagree with what you said about BC/BC2 trying to copy MW and MW2, as both Bad Company campaigns were completely different and unique compared to the Call of Duty campaigns... I have no idea how you came to that conclusion, it baffles me.

The story itself is trying to copy MW and MW2 and the level design is no different either. I haven't played BC1, but BC2 was like a MW wannabe. Just play it through and you'll see what I mean - this contains spoilers, so I wouldn't like to post it in this thread. - I'll make another one, maybe.

Factually, Battlefield: Bad Company 2 has more realistic graphics than any other Call of Duty game, however, past Call of Duty games have always had an edge over the older Battlefield games. With the older Battlefield games being mass-multiplayer action, it meant that back in the day they couldn't really afford to make the visuals in the games any better than they already were. However, having said that, Battlefield 2's visuals for when it was released in 2005 were excellent, but just fell short of the likes of Call of Duty 2, as Infinity Ward's graphics engine owned a lot of game engines around that time.

Call of Duty's weapons are better looking and the characters look a bit better. Apart from some bad textures at certain areas, Call of Duty's visuals are somewhat better than the ones of BC2.